United States v. Gari

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing de novo a defendant’s claim the district court violated his Sixth Amendment rights
• “Neither a motion in limine nor a blanket statement . . . is suffi- cient to preserve an evidentiary ruling for review by this court.”
• “Hearsay is admissible if it falls within one of the hearsay exceptions enumerated in Federal Rules of Evidence 803, 804, and 807.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).