United States v. Peter E. Clay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a CBA is ambiguous if it is \reasonably susceptible to at least two reasonable but conflicting meanings\
• A term is ambiguous where it is \reasonably susceptible to at least two reasonable but conflicting meanings.\
• “Contracts that are silent as to their duration will ordinarily be treated not as operative in perpetuity but as operative for a reasonable time.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).