Skip to main content
· 10/4/2002

United States v. Lowell E. Roberts

Citations

  • 308 F.3d 1147
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20926
  • 2002 WL 31209227

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a challenge to venue failed because “appellant did not present his venue objection until the prosecution had rested its case”
  • concluding that defendant waived his venue challenge by not raising it until the close of the prosecution’s case because defendant was aware of the basis for his objection before the close of evidence
  • showing a defendant who falsely subscribed to statements in a habeas petition resulted in a perjury prosecution
  • declarant susceptible to prosecution for perjury despite “to the best of my knowledge and belief” disclaimer in declaration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Anderson, Dubina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.