United States v. Michael Nemuras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the district court did not clearly err in finding that photo- graphs of a 4-year-old girl depicted “sexually explicit con- duct” and affirming defendant’s conviction under § 2251
• defining lewd as “showing, or intended to excite, lust or sexual desire, esp. in an offensive way”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Dost
  S.D. California· 1986-06-12· cited 359×
• United States v. Edwin E. Wiegand
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-03-18· cited 269×
• United States v. Overton
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-14· cited 110×
• United States v. Michael Arvin
  Ninth Circuit· 1990-04-12· cited 77×
• United States v. Lamb
  N.D. New York· 1996-11-05· cited 57×
• United States v. Charles Hillie
  D.C. Circuit· 2021-09-17· cited 27×
• State v. Roberts
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-10-03· cited 24×
• State v. Helgoth
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1985-05-29· cited 18×
• State v. Fussell
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2006-09-27· cited 17×
• State v. Gates
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-09-27· cited 17×
• United States v. Reedy
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1986-04-16· cited 16×
• Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
  S.D. Florida· 1989-10-05· cited 10×
• United States v. Overton
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-06-18
• United States v. Walter Overton
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-14
• United States v. Charles Hillie (AMENDED OPINION)
  D.C. Circuit· 2022-06-28

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• New York v. Ferber
  Supreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
• United States v. Nemuras
  D. Maryland· 1983-05-18· cited 18×