Skip to main content
· 7/29/1986

United States v. James E. Smith

Citations

  • 795 F.2d 841
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that refusal to sever charges was not manifestly prejudicial where prosecution and court took great pains to avoid emphasizing the charges were somehow connected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wiggins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.