People v. Kongs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the section must be construed reasonably as setting up an objective test for annoyance or molestation\
• holding that under California law, “sexual conduct” does not require a nude exhibition of the genitals
• holding that “the acts forbidden [by the statute] are those motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest or intent with respect to children”
• noting that the Wolf factors are useful in applying the California Penal Code
• “For the most part, [this section] has been applied to incidents of explicit sexual conduct . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).