United States v. Segun Ashimi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a petitioner cannot establish prejudice without showing “what the attorney would have discovered after ‘adequate’ investigation”
• stating that a petitioner cannot establish prejudice without showing “what the attorney would have discovered after ‘adequate’ investigation”
• stating that a petitioner cannot establish prejudice without showing “what the attorney would have discovered after ‘adequate’ investigation”
• stating that a petitioner cannot establish prejudice prong of ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on counsel’s failure to investigate without showing “what the attorney would have discovered after ‘adequate’ investigation”
• stating that a petitioner cannot establish prejudice prong of ineffective assistance of counsel claim based on counsel’s failure to investigate without showing “what the attorney would have discovered after ‘adequate’ investigation”
• “Simmons does not apply, however, when a defendant is made to choose between a constitutional benefit and a statutory benefit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).