Seventh Circuit· 11/13/2003
United States v. Mark A. Reed
Citations
- 349 F.3d 457
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23130
- 2003 WL 22671598
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that purposefulness factor “is considered the most important because it is tied directly to the rationale underlying the exclusionary rule, deterrence of police misconduct”
- “Because the determination involves is- sues of fact as well as law, they are more properly addressed by the district court in the first instance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Ripple, Rovner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named United States v. Mark A. Reed
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.