Skip to main content
Seventh Circuit· 11/13/2003

United States v. Mark A. Reed

Citations

  • 349 F.3d 457
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23130
  • 2003 WL 22671598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that purposefulness factor “is considered the most important because it is tied directly to the rationale underlying the exclusionary rule, deterrence of police misconduct”
  • “Because the determination involves is- sues of fact as well as law, they are more properly addressed by the district court in the first instance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Ripple, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named United States v. Mark A. Reed

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.