Skip to main content
First Circuit· 3/15/2019

United States v. Smith

Citations

  • 919 F.3d 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that six separate videos over the course of an hour can be grounds for six separate counts un- der 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a)
  • holding that defendant's six convictions for violations of § 2251(a) were not multiplicitous because he had produced six separate visual depictions of a minor engaged in sexually explicit conduct
  • distinguishing the \professional and polite\ interactions at issue from the \extreme tactics the Supreme Court [has] deemed coercive\
  • “The presence of intervening circumstances that provide the defendant an opportunity to pause and reflect, to decline consent, or to revoke consent help demonstrate that the illegality was attenuated.”
  • addressing taint and voluntariness of consent separately

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lynch, Stahl, Barron

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.