David Haywood v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying Franks to misrepresentations made in the context of continued detention
• even though warrantless arrest was “clearly” supported by probable cause, Fourth Amendment required a prob- able cause hearing before a judicial officer
• a “ ‘tan card’ . . . certifies that the cardholder, being employed by a licensed security agency . . . and having received firearms training, may carry a weapon while working or commuting”
• “Haywood was arrested lawfully [with probable cause]. But he could not, consistent with the Fourth Amendment, be continued in custody beyond 48 hours ... unless a judicial officer determined there was probable cause to believe that he had committed a crime.”
• “Haywood was arrested lawfully [with probable cause]. But he could not, consistent with the Fourth Amendment, be continued in custody beyond 48 hours . . . unless a judicial officer determined there was probable cause to believe that he had committed a crime.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).