United States v. Maggi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[ North Carolina State Ports Authority v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.
• noting that Maggi had “1/64 Blackfoot blood” but declining to “resolve . . . whether there is a baseline quantum of Indian blood required because Maggi does not meet [the] second prong of tribal or government recognition”
• \When it is apparent from the court records that on appeal the question has become moot (or the appeal abandoned)
• \When it is apparent from the court records that on appeal the question has become moot (or the appeal abandoned)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).