United States v. Robert D. Stewart, Jr., AKA Robert Wilson Stewart, Bob Stewart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not err in admitting audio recording although government did not preserve the original digital recording but instead downloaded the data to disk and offered a duplicate recording at trial
• holding second conviction multiplicitous where government agent’s trial testimony did not establish that defendant’s second false statement added “any additional impairment to his investigation”
• holding second conviction multiplicitous where defendant made identical false statements to same FBI agent
• reviewing de novo the denial of a motion for acquittal based on insufficient evidence
• “[O]ne cannot have the intent required under section 115(a)(1)(B) without also intending to make the threat.”
• “An indictment is multiplicitous when it charges multiple counts for 22 a single offense, producing two penalties for one crime and thus raising double 23 jeopardy questions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).