United States v. LaBuff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that this factor “could be established by demonstrating eligibility rather than actual receipt of benefits”
• rejecting the argument that this factor “could be established by demonstrating eligibility rather than actual receipt of benefits”
• rejecting the argument that this factor “could be established by demonstrating eligibility rather than actual receipt of benefits”
• noting “that on multiple occasions, [the defendant] was arrested, prosecuted, and convicted under the jurisdiction of the tribal courts” and that “the assumption and exercise of tribal jurisdiction over criminal charges[ ] demonstrates tribal recognition”
• noting “that on multiple occasions, [the defendant] was arrested, prosecuted, and convicted under the jurisdiction of the tribal courts” and that “the assumption and exercise of tribal jurisdiction over criminal charges[ ] demonstrates tribal recognition”
• noting “that on multiple occasions, [the defendant] was arrested, prosecuted, and convicted under the jurisdiction of the tribal courts” and that “the assumption and exercise of tribal jurisdiction over criminal charges[ ] demonstrates tribal recognition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).