Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/2/1997
State v. Sebastian
Citations
- 243 Conn. 115
- 701 A.2d 13
- 1997 Conn. LEXIS 326
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying two part test and stating that “[generally, the first so-called racial prong of this test must be met as well as the second, non-racial prong”
- considering defendant's claim that two federal acts preempted state criminal law
- applying the four St. Cloud factors “in declining order of importance”
- applying the four St. Cloud factors “in declining order of importance”
- “The four factors enumerated in St. Cloud have emerged as a widely accepted test for Indian status in the federal courts.”
- “The four factors enumerated in St. Cloud have emerged as a widely accepted test for Indian status in the federal courts.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Palmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Oklahoma v. Castro-HuertaSupreme Court· 2022-06-29· cited 147×
- Kizis v. Morse Diesel International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-04-16· cited 80×
- United States v. Ricco Devon PrentissTenth Circuit· 2001-12-06· cited 70×
- United States v. MaggiNinth Circuit· 2010-03-16· cited 27×
- Dark-Eyes v. Commissioner of Revenue ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-03· cited 21×
- State v. VelkySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-20· cited 10×
- First American Casino Corp. v. Eastern Pequot NationD. Connecticut· 2000-05-10· cited 9×
- Mohegan Tribe of Indians v. Mohegan Tribe & Nation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-02-20· cited 5×
- People v. CollinsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2012-10-23· cited 3×
- O'Toole v. Eyelets for Industry, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2014-02-25· cited 2×
- State v. WatsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 1998-02-09· cited 2×
- In Re GarvaisE.D. Washington· 2004-12-02
- State v. NoblesSupreme Court of North Carolina· 2020-02-28
Cites
75 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,878×
- Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of IdahoSupreme Court· 1997-06-23· cited 1,372×
- Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1981-05-26· cited 1,191×
- United States v. WheelerSupreme Court· 1978-03-22· cited 1,076×
- Williams v. LeeSupreme Court· 1959-01-12· cited 1,006×
- White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerSupreme Court· 1980-06-27· cited 778×
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court· 1987-02-25· cited 645×
- Washington v. Confederated Bands & Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationSupreme Court· 1979-02-26· cited 453×
- Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of WashingtonSupreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 379×
- Negonsott v. SamuelsSupreme Court· 1993-02-24· cited 334×
- Solem v. BartlettSupreme Court· 1984-02-22· cited 328×
- United States v. AntelopeSupreme Court· 1977-04-19· cited 312×
- Duro v. ReinaSupreme Court· 1990-05-29· cited 294×
- Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P. C.Supreme Court· 1984-05-29· cited 284×
- United States v. McBratneySupreme Court· 1882-03-18· cited 270×
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-04-01· cited 224×
- Rooney v. First Wisconsin National Bank of MilwaukeeSupreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 214×
- United States v. JohnSupreme Court· 1978-06-23· cited 202×
- United States v. John Tortora, United States of America v. Samuel SantoroSecond Circuit· 1972-07-24· cited 195×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.