Skip to main content
· 12/13/1996

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Nathaniel Earl KEYS, Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 103 F.3d 758
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9008
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 14933
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 32669
  • 1996 WL 714392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Antelope had upheld prosecution on equal protection grounds because “the term ‘Indian’ describes a political group or membership, not a racial group”
  • reviewing Indian status de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Choy, Reavley, Leavy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.