Tenth Circuit· 4/17/2007
United States v. Luke-Sanchez
Citations
- 483 F.3d 703
- 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 8787
- 2007 WL 1128878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a party preserves only the specific grounds stated in the objection in district court
- holding that trading drugs for guns satisfies § 924(c)’s “possession in furtherance of’ prong
- “A party’s objection to a jury instruction must be sufficiently clear such that the grounds stated in the objection are obvious, plain, or unmistakable.” (brackets and internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lucero, McKay, Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. KuehneSixth Circuit· 2008-10-28· cited 202×
- United States v. McGeheeTenth Circuit· 2012-02-22· cited 144×
- United States v. BedfordTenth Circuit· 2008-08-12· cited 92×
- United States v. SmithTenth Circuit· 2008-07-23· cited 88×
- United States v. BowenTenth Circuit· 2008-06-02· cited 80×
- United States v. RogersTenth Circuit· 2009-03-03· cited 77×
- United States v. KingTenth Circuit· 2011-01-19· cited 62×
- United States v. DoodySeventh Circuit· 2010-04-02· cited 46×
- United States v. EllisTenth Circuit· 2017-08-24· cited 24×
- United States v. Jeffery L. DickersonSeventh Circuit· 2013-01-23· cited 23×
- United States v. Sierra-LedesmaTenth Circuit· 2011-06-02· cited 22×
- United States v. KahnTenth Circuit· 2023-02-03· cited 19×
- United States v. GurkaFirst Circuit· 2010-05-12· cited 18×
- United States v. MahanNinth Circuit· 2009-11-16· cited 16×
- United States v. SterlingFifth Circuit· 2009-01-15· cited 14×
- United States v. GardnerSecond Circuit· 2010-03-10· cited 10×
- United States v. DolliverFirst Circuit· 2007-07-13· cited 10×
- United States v. LoweTenth Circuit· 2024-09-20· cited 9×
- United States v. MirandaEleventh Circuit· 2012-01-10· cited 6×
- United States v. Aranda-DiazTenth Circuit· 2015-08-05· cited 1×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-12-06· cited 3,526×
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court· 1973-04-24· cited 2,012×
- Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. v. Aspen Skiing Co.Tenth Circuit· 1984-07-13· cited 141×
- United States v. Allen Lawrence, Jr.Sixth Circuit· 2002-10-28· cited 110×
- United States v. Jermaine Raynard FrederickSixth Circuit· 2005-05-05· cited 85×
- United States v. CurtisTenth Circuit· 2003-09-17· cited 81×
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Johnnie Edgar Warwick, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeSixth Circuit· 1999-02-10· cited 78×
- United States v. UlloaFifth Circuit· 1996-08-29· cited 47×
- United States v. Chinh Trong NguyenTenth Circuit· 2005-06-29· cited 44×
- United States v. Joseph Westmoreland, Also Known as SmokeSeventh Circuit· 1997-08-20· cited 38×
- United States v. RobinsonTenth Circuit· 2006-01-26· cited 32×
- United States v. Roberto Ramirez-Rangel, and Joel Lobo-OsunaNinth Circuit· 1997-01-09· cited 31×
- United States v. James D. Sumler, A/K/A Chew, A/K/A Smoke James D. SumlerThird Circuit· 2002-06-27· cited 19×
- United States v. Cordova-ArevaloTenth Circuit· 2006-08-08· cited 13×
- United States v. CottoFirst Circuit· 2006-08-02· cited 10×
Other cases named United States v. Luke-Sanchez
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.