Tenth Circuit· 7/23/2008
United States v. Smith
Citations
- 534 F.3d 1211
- 76 Fed. R. Serv. 1375
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 16188
- 2008 WL 2814809
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that graphic photos that “add[ed] nothing to the description of the bullet-ridden bodies except shock” would be unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403
- noting that graphic photos that “add[ed] nothing to the description of the bullet-ridden bodies except shock” would be unfairly prejudicial under Rule 403
- finding any error in admitting evidence harmless because the “remaining evidence against [the defendant] was so strong”
- finding any error in admitting photos harmless because the “remaining evidence against [the defendant] was so strong”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Henry, Tacha, Lucero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Hooks v. WorkmanTenth Circuit· 2012-08-03· cited 270×
- Ex Parte NapperCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-09-29· cited 207×
- United States v. CooperTenth Circuit· 2011-08-15· cited 191×
- United States v. Yeley-DavisTenth Circuit· 2011-01-20· cited 113×
- United States v. SimpsonTenth Circuit· 2017-01-10· cited 76×
- United States v. CookTenth Circuit· 2008-12-31· cited 71×
- United States v. WatsonTenth Circuit· 2014-09-11· cited 63×
- Southgate Master Fund, L.L.C. Ex Rel. Montgomery Capital Advisors, LLC v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 2011-09-30· cited 60×
- United States v. Acosta-GallardoTenth Circuit· 2011-08-30· cited 55×
- United States v. SturmTenth Circuit· 2012-03-13· cited 53×
- United States v. Gutierrez De LopezTenth Circuit· 2014-08-01· cited 49×
- United States v. McGlothinTenth Circuit· 2013-01-24· cited 43×
- United States v. VannTenth Circuit· 2015-01-16· cited 41×
- United States v. MollnerTenth Circuit· 2011-05-04· cited 35×
- United States v. TorresTenth Circuit· 2009-06-30· cited 34×
- United States v. PrinceTenth Circuit· 2011-08-05· cited 34×
- Energy West Mining Co. v. OliverTenth Circuit· 2009-02-20· cited 31×
- United States v. ThomasTenth Circuit· 2014-04-29· cited 29×
- United States v. CollinsTenth Circuit· 2009-08-04· cited 27×
- United States v. FordTenth Circuit· 2008-12-11· cited 26×
Cites
35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Snyder v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 2008-03-19· cited 1,296×
- United States v. Luis Anthony RiveraTenth Circuit· 1990-04-04· cited 491×
- O'Neal v. Ferguson Construction Co.Tenth Circuit· 2001-01-24· cited 355×
- Deters v. Equifax Credit Information Services, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2000-02-01· cited 190×
- United States v. Salvador MaglutaEleventh Circuit· 2005-07-27· cited 159×
- United States v. BarrettTenth Circuit· 2007-07-25· cited 145×
- United States v. VerbickasTenth Circuit· 2006-02-28· cited 107×
- United States v. Carlton Humphreynancy ReganTenth Circuit· 2000-04-04· cited 96×
- United States v. MaresTenth Circuit· 2006-03-24· cited 95×
- United States v. Shelby Wayne Sells Anthony Wayne SellsTenth Circuit· 2007-03-01· cited 87×
- United States v. QuintanillaTenth Circuit· 1999-10-01· cited 85×
- United States v. George L. Bohl, United States of America v. Richard R. BellTenth Circuit· 1994-05-20· cited 83×
- United States v. GwathneyTenth Circuit· 2006-09-26· cited 75×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.