United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Johnnie Edgar Warwick, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that circumstantial evidence alone is enough to sustain a conviction
• finding that the receipt of a gun in exchange for drugs does not constitute “use” of a firearm for purposes of § 924(c)(1)
• noting the evidence in that case that the defendant was in the process of moving, so that he had many of his possessions, including his guns, in the back seat and trunk of his car
• finding “in relation to” prong met when defendant carried guns while dealing drugs even though he might also have been carrying the guns with the intent to sell them
• “[W]e have consistently rejected defendants’ attempts to argue that the government’s conduct in inducing them to commit the crimes charged was so outrageous as to deprive them of their constitutional rights.”
• “[W]e have consistently rejected defendants’ attempts to argue that the government’s conduct in inducing them to commit the crimes charged was so outrageous as to deprive them of their constitutional rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).