United States v. Gurka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• expressing agreement with the Second, Seventh, and Ninth Circuits that “Watson does not affect the prong of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) concerned with ‘possession in furtherance of ”
• involving a defendant who paid the agent cash and drugs to obtain guns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).