United States v. Luis Hernando Ramirez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s “silence in the wake of two questions, while answering others, did not constitute even an equivocal invocation of his right to remain silent.”
• assuming, arguendo, that Davis applies to invocations of the right to remain silent, but not holding that it definitely does
• to the extent that Davis applies to the right to remain silent, Defendant’s nonresponse did not constitute a clear request that questioning cease

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).