Alaska Supreme Court· 11/18/2005

Munson v. State

Citations

123 P.3d 1042
2005 Alas. LEXIS 160
2005 WL 3081632

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “proper invocation” of the right to remain silent requires a context in which “injurious disclosure could result”
noting that we have interpreted article I, section 9 of the Alaska Constitution \more broadly than the U.S. Supreme Court has construed the Fifth Amendment of the Federal Constitution\
“[T]he core protection is a prohibition on compelling a defendant to testify against himself at trial”
“[T]he state nonetheless maintains that Munson never invoked his constitutional rights because his request was motivated by a fear of Sam Camanga and, thus, equivocal.”
“ ‘Well, I’m done tallón’ then,’ ” invoked right to silence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fabe, Matthews, Eastaugh, Bryner, Carpeneti

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

71 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.