First Circuit· 8/20/2002
United States v. Lopez
Citations
- 300 F.3d 46
- 2002 WL 1880282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding, among other things that, \the necessity reguirement is not tantamount to an exhaustion reguirement.\
- finding wiretap application sufficient where affidavit demonstrated that traditional techniques “failed to establish the identity of some conspirators”
- degree of judicial supervision a factor for determining reasonableness of minimization efforts
- state held to standard of honest effort
- honest effort required, not perfection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. Nelson-RodriguezFirst Circuit· 2003-02-07· cited 149×
- United States v. RodriguesFirst Circuit· 2017-03-01· cited 29×
- United States v. JonesDistrict of Columbia· 2006-08-10· cited 26×
- United States v. YarbroughTenth Circuit· 2008-06-03· cited 24×
- United States v. CaoFirst Circuit· 2006-12-15· cited 24×
- United States v. Santana-DonesFirst Circuit· 2019-03-29· cited 16×
- United States v. RiveraE.D. Virginia· 2003-11-17· cited 8×
- United States v. RenziD. Arizona· 2010-06-04· cited 5×
- United States v. Dung LeD. Maine· 2005-06-24· cited 3×
- United States v. Melendez-SantiagoD. Puerto Rico· 2006-08-18· cited 3×
- United States v. Lazu-RiveraD. Puerto Rico· 2005-03-23· cited 2×
- United States v. SantanaD. New Hampshire· 2002-09-06· cited 2×
- United States v. De Castro FontD. Puerto Rico· 2009-01-15
- United States v. VasquezFirst Circuit· 2019-03-29
- United States v. ArevaloD. Kansas· 2015-06-18
- United States v. FlynnDistrict of Columbia· 2018-12-12
- US V. GingrasD. New Hampshire· 2002-12-09
- US v. SantanaD. New Hampshire· 2002-09-06
- NH v. Blind VendorsD. New Hampshire· 2003-03-28
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-03-24· cited 2,200×
- Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-06-26· cited 1,598×
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 898×
- United States v. KahnSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 457×
- United States v. DonovanSupreme Court· 1977-01-18· cited 403×
- Bartnicki v. VopperSupreme Court· 2001-05-21· cited 378×
- United States v. ChavezSupreme Court· 1974-05-13· cited 348×
- United States v. DavidFirst Circuit· 1991-07-29· cited 214×
- United States v. EdwardsTenth Circuit· 1995-10-24· cited 190×
- United States v. Barry HoffmanFirst Circuit· 1987-11-06· cited 179×
- United States v. Eusebio Escobar-De JesusFirst Circuit· 1999-10-05· cited 134×
- United States v. CharlesFirst Circuit· 2000-05-24· cited 115×
- United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America v. David RashFirst Circuit· 1989-12-04· cited 109×
- United States v. MitchellFirst Circuit· 1996-06-05· cited 94×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1997-08-26· cited 91×
- United States v. CabaFirst Circuit· 2001-03-02· cited 72×
- United States v. BennettNinth Circuit· 2000-07-28· cited 69×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.