Skip to main content
First Circuit· 3/2/2001

United States v. Caba

Citations

  • 241 F.3d 98
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 3120
  • 2001 WL 194881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, within these parameters, Apprendi permits an upward adjustment for a defendant's role in a drug-trafficking conspiracy
  • holding that no Apprendi error occurred where district court sentenced defendant based on Guidelines range, even though quantity of crack cocaine that district court found for Guidelines purposes was high enough to allow higher statutory maximum
  • “[E]ven after Apprendi the existence vel non of sentencing factors that boost a defendant’s sentence but do not trip a new statutory maximum remain grist for the district judge’s mill under a preponderance-of-the-evidence standard.”
  • \Apprendi simply does not apply to guideline findings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Lynch, Lipez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Caba

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.