United States v. Nestor Uribe, United States of America v. Leon Alberior Rave-Arias, United States of America v. David Rash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the fact that a felon juror technically should have been disqualified under statute does not automatically require a new trial
• explaining that “Title III demands a practical, commonsense approach to exploration of investigatory avenues”
• noting that possession with intent to distribute is a continuing offense under § 3237(a)
• finding waiver when basis for objection could have been gleaned from jury questionnaires available to counsel on motion
• noting right to exclude felon jurors is statutory right, not constitutional one
• “the statutory violation — allowing a convicted felon to serve — did not implicate the fundamental fairness of the trial or the defendants’ constitutional rights”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).