United States v. Larry D. Bach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the MVRA “enables the tort victim to recover his damages in a summary proceeding ancillary to a criminal prosecution”
• mailings that failed to elicit additional money from fraud victims furthered scheme to “obtain and retain” payments by duped investors
• “Functionally, the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act is a tort statute, though one that casts back to a much earlier era of Anglo-American law, when criminal and tort proceedings were not clearly distinguished.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).