United States v. Robert Allen Edwards A/K/A Fidel Salim A/K/A James F. Winter, III A/K/A Charles King A/K/A Donald W. Coleman, Robert Allen Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that applying the MVRA to criminal conduct committed before the MVRA’s enactment violates the Ex Post Facto Clause
• holding that restitution ordered under the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA), 18 U.S.C. S 3663A, constitutes punishment for the purpose of Ex Post Facto Clause analysis
• imposing restitution on defendant for criminal conduct occurring prior to MVRA’s enactment violates Ex Post Facto Clause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).