D. Utah· 5/11/2004
United States v. Bedonie
Citations
- 317 F. Supp. 2d 1285
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8420
- 2004 WL 1062842
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- suggesting that the same test for “punishment” should apply in both the ex post facto and rule of lenity contexts
- explaining that a rule under which a defendant could never be required to pay anything above the court-imposed payment schedule would significantly hamper crime victims and contradict the fundamental purposes of the MVRA
- discussing reasons for amount to be due in full immediately
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cassell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. SerawopTenth Circuit· 2007-10-25· cited 76×
- Koile v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-07-06· cited 63×
- United States v. Theodore Anthony CienfuegosNinth Circuit· 2006-09-08· cited 43×
- United States v. WilsonD. Utah· 2005-01-13· cited 42×
- United States v. CroxfordD. Utah· 2004-07-07· cited 32×
- Eliot S. Sash v. Michael Zenk, Federal Bureau of PrisonsSecond Circuit· 2006-02-22· cited 31×
- United States v. VisinaizD. Utah· 2004-11-16· cited 10×
- United States v. HawkinsW.D. Virginia· 2005-10-19· cited 7×
- United States v. CasadosTenth Circuit· 2022-02-18· cited 4×
- G.M.M. v. KimpsonE.D. New York· 2015-07-29· cited 4×
- McMillan v. City of New YorkE.D. New York· 2008-10-14· cited 4×
- United States v. SerawopD. Utah· 2006-01-11· cited 2×
- United States v. HarwoodD. New Mexico· 2012-02-13· cited 2×
- United States v. CienfuegosNinth Circuit· 2006-09-08
- United States v. VillongcoDistrict of Columbia· 2016-07-11
- United States v. QuamD. Minnesota· 2015-09-01
Cites
111 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court· 1946-03-25· cited 1,158×
- Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Assn.Supreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 953×
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-05-15· cited 941×
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-05-21· cited 871×
- City of Los Angeles Department of Water v. ManhartSupreme Court· 1978-04-25· cited 734×
- Crandon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1990-02-27· cited 696×
- Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1978-02-28· cited 656×
- Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore.Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 631×
- United States v. Leo BishopNinth Circuit· 1992-03-25· cited 356×
- United States v. NicholsTenth Circuit· 1999-02-26· cited 233×
- Donna Reilly, Etc. v. United StatesFirst Circuit· 1988-12-14· cited 230×
- United States v. Jefferson County Board of EducationFifth Circuit· 1966-12-29· cited 221×
- Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity & Deferred Compensation Plans v. NorrisSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 199×
- United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzSeventh Circuit· 1985-07-08· cited 184×
- United States v. R. L. C.Supreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 179×
- United States v. RLCSupreme Court· 1992-03-24· cited 169×
- United States v. MeadeFirst Circuit· 1999-05-12· cited 166×
- Barrett N. Weinberger v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 2001-10-05· cited 160×
- United States v. Louis RochesterFifth Circuit· 1990-05-11· cited 137×
Other cases named United States v. Bedonie
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.