Ninth Circuit· 8/16/2007

United States v. Lambert

Citations

498 F.3d 963
2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19463
2007 WL 2325144

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

surveying the circuits and rejecting defendant’s argument that the guideline requires “exploitation of a charitable impulse” even though all examples in the commentary involve such an exploitation
disregarding the commentary to the degree it is inconsistent with the plain language of the guidelines
surveying the circuits and rejecting defendant’s argument that the guideline requires “ex- ploitation of a charitable impulse” even though all examples in the com- mentary involve such an exploitation
“The Guidelines, including enhancements, are ordinarily applied in light of available commentary, including application notes.”
“ ‘The Guidelines, including enhancements, are ordinarily applied in light of available commentary, including application notes.’ ”
“[A] defendant’s exploitation of his victim’s charitable impulses is not required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alarcón, Hawkins, Wardlaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Lambert

33 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.