Sixth Circuit· 1/2/2003
United States v. Daniel S. Wiant
Citations
- 314 F.3d 826
- 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 1
- 2003 WL 25872282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding, in context of “affected a financial institution” that “breadth of [its] definition indicates that” word “affect” “is intended 67 to encompass even minimal impacts”
- explaining that a defendant must do more than merely deny a PSR’s factual allegations without support
- affirming enhancement for administrative officer of charity who instructed bank to transfer grant funds into his personal account
- “At the hearing, Wiant agreed that the objection was irrelevant because it had no effect on the Sentencing Guidelines[.]”
- “The seriousness of the 4-point enhancement, of course, reflects the other key limitation of this provision — that the defendant derive more than $1,000,000 in gross receipts from the offense.”
- agent of American Cancer Society of Ohio
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keith, Kennedy, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. TreadwellNinth Circuit· 2010-01-28· cited 207×
- United States v. Donna LangSixth Circuit· 2003-06-27· cited 63×
- United States v. Robert Stinson, Jr.Third Circuit· 2013-08-21· cited 55×
- United States v. Carson BeasleySixth Circuit· 2006-04-03· cited 40×
- United States v. LambertNinth Circuit· 2007-08-16· cited 35×
- United States v. David L. MayleSixth Circuit· 2003-07-01· cited 33×
- United States v. BensonSixth Circuit· 2003-10-28· cited 26×
- United States v. ReasorFifth Circuit· 2008-08-14· cited 23×
- Rhinelander Paper Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionD.C. Circuit· 2005-04-12· cited 16×
- United States v. AderinoyeFifth Circuit· 2022-05-11· cited 10×
- Abbott Laboratories v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-09-24· cited 9×
- United States v. Stuart NitzkinSeventh Circuit· 2022-06-22· cited 4×
- KindHearts for Charitable Humanitarian Development, Inc. v. GeithnerN.D. Ohio· 2009-10-26· cited 1×
- United States v. WilliamsSeventh Circuit· 2003-11-21· cited 1×
- United States v. Cardenas-VelezSixth Circuit· 2004-02-11· cited 1×
- Wiant v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-04-07
- United States v. BeasleySixth Circuit· 2006-04-03
- United States v. LambertNinth Circuit· 2007-08-15
- United States v. Randall TreadwellNinth Circuit· 2010-01-28
- New York v. United States Dep't of JusticeSecond Circuit· 2020-02-26
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Buford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-03-20· cited 448×
- United States v. William Aramony, United States of America v. Thomas J. MerloFourth Circuit· 1999-01-28· cited 233×
- United States v. Sadie Latouf (95-4095), Joseph N. Sarich (95-4112), Mario Guerrieri (95-4115), Richard A. Harakal (95-4233)Sixth Circuit· 1997-12-18· cited 172×
- United States v. John G. Bennett, Jr.Third Circuit· 1998-11-16· cited 131×
- United States v. Ronald Alan EnnengaSixth Circuit· 2001-08-17· cited 120×
- United States v. SchinnellFifth Circuit· 1996-04-10· cited 75×
- United States v. Linda Tackett (95-6127) Grayson Tackett (95-6128)Sixth Circuit· 1997-06-23· cited 63×
- United States v. Gregory W. Frazier, Cross-AppelleeTenth Circuit· 1995-04-20· cited 61×
- United States v. George M. ParrottSixth Circuit· 1998-07-06· cited 56×
- United States v. Theodore Charles GreeneSixth Circuit· 1995-12-11· cited 42×
- United States v. Jeffery BennettSixth Circuit· 2002-05-30· cited 36×
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Linda D. JOHNSON, Defendant-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1997-12-10· cited 33×
- United States v. Tracey HartzSeventh Circuit· 2002-07-16· cited 33×
- United States v. Russell Marcum, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1994-02-10· cited 28×
- United States v. Michael BensonSixth Circuit· 1998-01-21· cited 23×
- United States v. Roberto FerreraSeventh Circuit· 1997-02-24· cited 16×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.