United States v. Daniel S. Wiant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in context of “affected a financial institution” that “breadth of [its] definition indicates that” word “affect” “is intended 67 to encompass even minimal impacts”
• explaining that a defendant must do more than merely deny a PSR’s factual allegations without support
• affirming enhancement for administrative officer of charity who instructed bank to transfer grant funds into his personal account
• “At the hearing, Wiant agreed that the objection was irrelevant because it had no effect on the Sentencing Guidelines[.]”
• “The seriousness of the 4-point enhancement, of course, reflects the other key limitation of this provision — that the defendant derive more than $1,000,000 in gross receipts from the offense.”
• agent of American Cancer Society of Ohio

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).