United States v. Lambert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the wife, as co-owner of the polluted property, was not an appropriate target of civil penalties because she had not \actively directed or caused\ the unlawful discharges
• holding that the wife, as co-owner of the polluted property, was not an appropriate target of civil penalties because she had not “actively directed or caused” the unlawful discharges

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. John Pozsgai, Gizella Pozsgai, Mercer Wrecking & Recycling Corporation, J. Vinch & Sons, Inc. John Pozsgai and Gizella Pozsgai
  Third Circuit· 1993-08-10· cited 50×
• United States v. Larkins
  W.D. Kentucky· 1987-01-16· cited 18×
• Leslie Salt Co. v. United States
  N.D. California· 1987-04-24· cited 10×
• In Re Alameda County Assessor's Parcel Nos. 537-801-2-4 & 537-850-9
  N.D. California· 1987-06-03· cited 6×
• Puget Soundkeeper Alliance v. Total Terminals Int'l, LLC
  W.D. Washington· 2019-03-04· cited 4×
• United States v. Banks
  S.D. Florida· 1995-01-13· cited 3×
• United States v. Alcoa Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 2000-05-26· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Ward
  Supreme Court· 1980-08-22· cited 969×
• United States v. Regan
  Supreme Court· 1914-01-05· cited 133×
• National Wildlife Federation v. John O. Marsh, Secretary of the Army
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-12-19· cited 50×
• United States v. John v. Tilton, Brenda Tilton and I.T.T. Rayonier, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1983-05-19· cited 17×
• United States v. Riverside Bayview Homes, Inc.
  Sixth Circuit· 1984-03-07· cited 13×
• United States of America, and State of Florida, Department of Environmental Regulation, Plaintiff-Intervenor v. Context-Marks Corporation
  Eleventh Circuit· 1984-03-29· cited 12×