S.D. West Virginia· 1/31/1996

United States v. Lambert

Citations

915 F. Supp. 797
1996 A.M.C. 1704
26 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21116
1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1343
1996 WL 55970

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that where a subsidiary that holds a NPDES permit violates § 309(d
noting that ownership of the property on which unauthorized work is performed is evidence of responsibility for or control over the unauthorized work
\[t]he dock and its extension are 'structures' that obstruct the navigable capacity of the River. The River's normal flow and circulation patterns have been disrupted also\
impliedly classifying 27 broken concrete, stone, and soil as fill material but referring to dock as structure
\[t]he dock and its extension are `structures' that obstruct the navigable capacity of the River. The River's normal flow and circulation patterns have been disrupted also\
“[W]here a 13 party has no decision-making authority, does not participate in the planning of a project, and 14 whose will has no impact on whether and to what extent dredge materials are discharged into 15 waters of the United States, that party cannot suffer liability under CWA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.