United States v. Rodney Robert Kimbrew, A.K.A. Carlton Cochran

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court should still consult the now-advisory Sentencing Guide- lines for advice in determining an appropriate sentence
• noting that “[t]he Blockburger test focuses on the statutory elements of each offense, not on the actual evidence presented at trial”
• “This court reviews ... the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts of this case for abuse of discretion.”
• “This court reviews . . . the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts of this case for abuse of discretion.”
• “This court reviews . . . the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts of this case for abuse of discretion.”
• “This court reviews . . . the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines to the facts of this case for abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).