United States v. Kluger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding factors did not support downward adjustment where defendant was entrusted with distributing “wholesale quantities of drugs worth hundreds of dollars”
• treating guidelines commentary as a specification for purposes of § 1B1.3(a)
• \[The stockbroker] is explicitly an individual 'to whom the defendant provided inside information.' \ (citation omitted)
• \[W]e review the District Court's application of the Guidelines to facts for abuse of discretion.\
• defendant’s “loving and supportive family [and] privileged childhood” were part of “history and characteristics”
• defendant’s “loving and supportive family [and] privileged childhood” were part of “history and characteristics”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).