United States v. Daryl Lonard Parker, A/K/A Daryl Lenard Parker, A/K/A Junior Parker, A/K/A Jr Parker, A/K/A Jr, Daryl Lonard Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[18 U.S.C.] § 3553(a)(6) by its terms plainly applies only where co-defendants are similarly situated[,]” and holding that defendants with different criminal histories are not similarly situated
• applying plain error review to the defendant's argument that the district court failed to give a sufficient statement of reasons under § 3553(c)
• “a criminal defendant has no constitutional right to be given a sentence equal in duration to that of his or her co-defendants”
• “A sentencing difference is not a forbidden disparity if it is justified by legitimate considerations, such as rewards for cooperation.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).