United States v. Victor Cora-Alicea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting petitioner's as applied challenges based on lack of access to the administrative record or counsel, due to failure to show prejudice
• explaining that reinstatement “does not offend due process because reinstatement of a prior order does not change the alien’s rights or remedies ... [and] creates no new obstacles to attacking the validity of the underlying removal order”
• reinstating a removal order “does not offend due process because reinstatement of a prior order does not change the alien’s rights or remedies”
• noting that Congress' purpose behind IIRIRA was to enable the prompt admission of those who are entitled to be admitted, the prompt exclusion or removal of those who are not so entitled, and the clear distinction between these categories
• noting that Congress' purpose behind IIRIRA was to enable the prompt admission of those who are entitled to be admitted, the prompt exclusion or removal of those who are not so entitled, and the clear distinction between these categories
• explaining that reinstatement “does not offend due process because reinstatement of a prior order does not change the alien’s rights or remedies . . . [and] creates no new obstacles to attacking the validity of the under- lying removal order”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).