United States v. Joseph Zingaro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It is well settled that the constructive amendment of an indictment is per se violative of the grand jury clause of the [F]ifth [A]mendment.”
• “It is well settled that the constructive amendment of an indictment is per se violative of the grand jury clause of the [F]ifth [A]mendment.”
• “The Supreme Court has made it clear, however, that an indictment drawn in more general terms may support a conviction on alternative bases, even though an indictment with specific charging terms will not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).