United States v. Susan Frank and Jane Frank Kresch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding intended harm proven where defendant waste disposers made misrepresentations to their customer that “could have subjected the [customer] to fines and to the loss of its environmental permit”
• the overt act element of a conspiracy charge may be satisfied by admission of evidence of an overt act that is not specified in the indictment, so long as there is no prejudice to the defendant
• the overt act element of a conspiracy charge may be satisfied by admission of evidence of an overt act that is not specified in the indictment, so long as there is no prejudice to the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).