United States v. John F. Dunn, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a constructive amendment, which embodies a material alteration of the charging terms of the indictment, whether literally or in effect, is regarded as prejudicial per se
• explaining that a constructive amendment, which embodies a material alteration of the charging terms of the indictment, whether literally or in effect, is regarded as prejudicial per se
• mere disagreement with co-conspirators is insufficient to constitute withdrawal from conspiracy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).