United States v. Steven A. Kuna, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• alleged variance in mail fraud prosecution was harmless because the defendant “was able to identify with great certainty the acts for which he was placed in jeopardy”
• alleged variance in mail fraud prosecution was harmless because the defendant “was able to identify with great certainty the acts for which he was placed in jeopardy”
• alleged variance in mail fraud prosecution was harmless because the defendant “was able to identify with great certainty the acts for which he was placed in jeopardy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).