Skip to main content
· 5/6/1992

United States v. John Patino

Citations

  • 962 F.2d 263
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 9831
  • 1992 WL 91763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[C]ourts have rejected claims that the type of firearm alleged in the indictment is an essential element under Section 924(c)(1) and have affirmed convictions where the evidence showed a different type of weapon.”
  • indictment mentioned one gun; prosecutor referred to three additional guns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feinberg, Winter, Altimari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.