· 9/1/2009
United States v. Winbush
Citations
- 580 F.3d 503
- 80 Fed. R. Serv. 783
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19636
- 2009 WL 2750258
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Our court has long recognized that testimony regarding the methods used by drug dealers is helpful to the jury and therefore a proper subject of expert testimony.”
- “Although an expert may not testify or opine that the defendant actually possessed the requisite mental state, he may testify in general terms about facts or circumstances from which a jury might infer that the defend- ant intended to [commit the charged crime].”
- affirming admission of expert testimony about indicia of distribution
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.