Skip to main content
· 9/1/2009

United States v. Winbush

Citations

  • 580 F.3d 503
  • 80 Fed. R. Serv. 783
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 19636
  • 2009 WL 2750258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Our court has long recognized that testimony regarding the methods used by drug dealers is helpful to the jury and therefore a proper subject of expert testimony.”
  • “Although an expert may not testify or opine that the defendant actually possessed the requisite mental state, he may testify in general terms about facts or circumstances from which a jury might infer that the defend- ant intended to [commit the charged crime].”
  • affirming admission of expert testimony about indicia of distribution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Rovner, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.