Skip to main content
· 9/7/2011

United States v. Pillado

Citations

  • 656 F.3d 754
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18601
  • 2011 WL 3907535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the most significant factor in predisposition analysis is “whether the defendant was reluctant to commit the offense”
  • explaining that the most significant factor in predisposition analysis is “whether the defendant was reluctant to commit the offense”
  • stating that inducement does not occur where “the government’s actions simply provided an opportunity for a person who was already ready and willing to commit the offense”
  • stating that inducement does not occur where “the government’s actions simply provided an opportunity for a person who was already ready and willing to commit the offense”
  • “[A] defen- dant must proffer some evidence on both elements of the entrapment defense to warrant the instruction … .”
  • “[A] defendant must proffer some evidence on both elements of the entrapment defense to warrant the instruction....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.