Seventh Circuit· 9/7/2011

United States v. Pillado

Citations

656 F.3d 754
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18601
2011 WL 3907535

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that the most significant factor in predisposition analysis is “whether the defendant was reluctant to commit the offense”
explaining that the most significant factor in predisposition analysis is “whether the defendant was reluctant to commit the offense”
stating that inducement does not occur where “the government’s actions simply provided an opportunity for a person who was already ready and willing to commit the offense”
stating that inducement does not occur where “the government’s actions simply provided an opportunity for a person who was already ready and willing to commit the offense”
“[A] defen- dant must proffer some evidence on both elements of the entrapment defense to warrant the instruction … .”
“[A] defendant must proffer some evidence on both elements of the entrapment defense to warrant the instruction....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.