· 9/7/2011
United States v. Pillado
Citations
- 656 F.3d 754
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18601
- 2011 WL 3907535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the most significant factor in predisposition analysis is “whether the defendant was reluctant to commit the offense”
- explaining that the most significant factor in predisposition analysis is “whether the defendant was reluctant to commit the offense”
- stating that inducement does not occur where “the government’s actions simply provided an opportunity for a person who was already ready and willing to commit the offense”
- stating that inducement does not occur where “the government’s actions simply provided an opportunity for a person who was already ready and willing to commit the offense”
- “[A] defen- dant must proffer some evidence on both elements of the entrapment defense to warrant the instruction … .”
- “[A] defendant must proffer some evidence on both elements of the entrapment defense to warrant the instruction....”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Wood, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.