Skip to main content
· 9/6/2011

United States v. Leiskunas

Citations

  • 656 F.3d 732
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18474
  • 2011 WL 3890461

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for a rationale when the district court provided no reasoning whatsoever for a loss amount
  • noting that focus is on average participant, not leaders
  • noting that focus is on average participant, not leaders
  • “A district court may consider a defendant’s cooperation with the government as a basis for a reduced sentence, even if the government has not made a [U.S.S.G.] § 5K1.1 or [Federal] Rule [of Criminal Procedure] 35 motion.”
  • also distinguishing the facts of Leiskunas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.