· 9/6/2011
United States v. Leiskunas
Citations
- 656 F.3d 732
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 18474
- 2011 WL 3890461
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for a rationale when the district court provided no reasoning whatsoever for a loss amount
- noting that focus is on average participant, not leaders
- noting that focus is on average participant, not leaders
- “A district court may consider a defendant’s cooperation with the government as a basis for a reduced sentence, even if the government has not made a [U.S.S.G.] § 5K1.1 or [Federal] Rule [of Criminal Procedure] 35 motion.”
- also distinguishing the facts of Leiskunas
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.