Fifth Circuit· 11/5/2012
United States v. John Terrell
Citations
- 700 F.3d 755
- 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 22717
- 2012 WL 5383540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- absent evidence that other individuals exercised any control over laptops, defendant’s assertion that someone else may have downloaded images or planted photos was “pure speculation”
- “The evidence need not exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence or be completely inconsistent with every conclusion except guilt, so long as a reasonable trier of fact could find that the evidence established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benavides, Owen, Per Curiam, Southwick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. David DiehlFifth Circuit· 2015-01-07· cited 124×
- United States v. Mark WoernerFifth Circuit· 2013-02-22· cited 75×
- United States v. Trevin RoundsFifth Circuit· 2014-04-09· cited 51×
- United States v. Christopher WaguespackFifth Circuit· 2019-08-15· cited 27×
- United States v. Riley LivelySixth Circuit· 2017-03-27· cited 20×
- United States v. Kevin SheldonNinth Circuit· 2014-04-09· cited 14×
- United States v. Julie GrantFifth Circuit· 2017-03-01· cited 14×
- United States v. Walter Jordan, IIIFifth Circuit· 2019-12-13· cited 12×
- United States v. Mohamed MotonFifth Circuit· 2020-03-02· cited 10×
- United States v. James SmithFifth Circuit· 2014-01-13· cited 5×
- United States v. GarciaFifth Circuit· 2024-04-23· cited 4×
- United States v. Kevin SheldonNinth Circuit· 2013-09-19· cited 3×
- United States v. Paul Edward Lee, Jr.Eleventh Circuit· 2022-03-21· cited 3×
- United States v. FreemanFifth Circuit· 2023-01-06· cited 2×
- United States v. BoppFifth Circuit· 2023-08-23· cited 1×
- United States v. James SmithFifth Circuit· 2014-01-20
- United States v. SepulvedaE.D. Virginia· 2014-11-06
- Stanley Charles Follett a/k/a Stanley Follett v. State of MississippiCourt of Appeals of Mississippi· 2024-02-27
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- United States v. FeolaSupreme Court· 1975-03-19· cited 856×
- Flores-Figueroa v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2009-05-04· cited 579×
- United States v. ReynaFifth Circuit· 1998-07-28· cited 261×
- United States v. YermianSupreme Court· 1984-06-27· cited 207×
- United States v. BetancourtFifth Circuit· 2009-10-09· cited 201×
- United States v. RunyanFifth Circuit· 2002-04-18· cited 192×
- United States v. Stefan IrvingSecond Circuit· 2006-06-23· cited 190×
- United States v. David Lamar Faulkner, Spencer H. Blain, Jr., James L. Toler and Arthur FormannFifth Circuit· 1994-04-29· cited 174×
- United States v. Antonio LopezFifth Circuit· 1996-01-23· cited 164×
- United States v. CampaEleventh Circuit· 2008-06-04· cited 152×
- United States v. Filemon Sotelo Sanchez, Jose Angel Naegele, and Rebeca Portillo Brito, United States of America v. Ricardo Portillo BritoFifth Circuit· 1992-05-19· cited 141×
- The United States of America v. Willie Lee DancyFifth Circuit· 1988-10-31· cited 136×
- United States v. Richard Michael SimkaninFifth Circuit· 2005-08-05· cited 135×
- United States v. MudekunyeFifth Circuit· 2011-07-11· cited 132×
- United States v. QuarrellTenth Circuit· 2002-11-05· cited 110×
- United States v. John Charles KuchinskiNinth Circuit· 2006-11-27· cited 110×
- United States v. Jamie Barrera Lopez, Eugenio Ozuna Ramirez, Jr., Eliseo De La Garza, and Robert San-Martin DelgadoFifth Circuit· 1993-01-11· cited 100×
- United States v. Steven P. Moser Lavoyd Wayne Dollar Franklin Rollin Johnston Billy Mack O'Neill Jerry Lynn Wilkins Thomas D. GandyFifth Circuit· 1997-10-17· cited 93×
- United States v. Edward Jimenez, Also Known as Big Eddie Paul SantivanezFifth Circuit· 2001-06-29· cited 82×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.