Fifth Circuit· 2/22/2013
United States v. Mark Woerner
Citations
- 709 F.3d 527
- 2013 WL 656731
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3742
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the first step in a “unit of prosecution” case is to “look to the statute charged” to determine Congress’s intent as to how to “castigate” the conduct at issue
- listing circumstances in which reliance on warrant is not objectively reasonable
- “[TJheir content was evident from their file names, undercutting any potential argument that they were downloaded by mistake.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Jolly, Benavides, Higginson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Matthew MassiFifth Circuit· 2014-08-01· cited 86×
- United States v. Marciano VasquezFifth Circuit· 2018-08-07· cited 68×
- United States v. William MillerSixth Circuit· 2020-12-03· cited 59×
- United States v. Caroline NjokuFifth Circuit· 2013-12-02· cited 56×
- United States v. RentzTenth Circuit· 2015-02-03· cited 54×
- United States v. WillisFifth Circuit· 2023-08-07· cited 43×
- United States v. Sebastian ContrerasFifth Circuit· 2018-10-01· cited 40×
- State of Minnesota v. Timothy John BakkenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-08-03· cited 26×
- United States v. NaidooFifth Circuit· 2021-04-19· cited 25×
- United States v. David McElmurryNinth Circuit· 2015-01-26· cited 24×
- United States v. Damian PatrickSeventh Circuit· 2016-11-23· cited 24×
- United States v. ForresterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2017-08-16· cited 22×
- United States v. SmithTenth Circuit· 2016-02-29· cited 18×
- United States v. Richard BartonFifth Circuit· 2018-01-09· cited 15×
- United States v. Eric BeverlyFifth Circuit· 2019-11-14· cited 12×
- United States v. SmithFifth Circuit· 2024-08-09· cited 11×
- United States v. Juvenal AmbrizFifth Circuit· 2013-08-16· cited 8×
- Thomas L. Zink v. StateMontana Supreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 7×
- United States v. DodsonW.D. Texas· 2013-08-13· cited 7×
- State v. ZinkMontana Supreme Court· 2014-02-25· cited 6×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- United States v. ReaganFifth Circuit· 2010-02-04· cited 211×
- United States v. MichellettiFifth Circuit· 1994-01-25· cited 194×
- United States v. Kevin C. ReillySecond Circuit· 1996-02-12· cited 187×
- United States v. Terry Burton KimbroughFifth Circuit· 1995-12-28· cited 180×
- United States v. FinleyFifth Circuit· 2007-01-26· cited 162×
- United States v. PolouizziSecond Circuit· 2009-04-24· cited 141×
- United States v. Kevin McClain George Brandt, III Jason DavisSixth Circuit· 2006-03-31· cited 133×
- United States v. Bennie Ree WhiteEighth Circuit· 1989-12-12· cited 129×
- United States v. Jay Vee Wanless, A/K/A William Earl Wanless, Douglass Scott Tompkins, Linda Aune, and Michael Eugene BeckNinth Circuit· 1989-08-23· cited 115×
- United States v. CavazosFifth Circuit· 2002-04-12· cited 113×
- United States v. ChiaradioFirst Circuit· 2012-07-11· cited 110×
- United States v. Nam Tan NguyenFifth Circuit· 1994-08-02· cited 101×
- United States v. PiresFirst Circuit· 2011-04-06· cited 95×
- United States v. PopeFifth Circuit· 2006-11-06· cited 89×
- United States v. Gary Bernard McGoughEleventh Circuit· 2005-06-15· cited 87×
- United States v. Thomas Reedy and Janice ReedyFifth Circuit· 2002-10-07· cited 87×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.