United States v. Kevin Sheldon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no abuse of discretion where the district court allowed in “only the sanitized record that [the d]efendant had been convicted of possession of child pornography” and the jury did not hear “the details of [the d]efendant’s conduct that resulted in the [prior] conviction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).