United States v. Edward Jimenez, Also Known as Big Eddie Paul Santivanez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an agreement not to prosecute and an immunity agreement are \in essence\ the same
• “Objecting to an in limine order excluding testimony or evidence does not relieve a party from making an offer of proof [at trial] . . . [unless] the trial court makes clear that it does not wish to hear further argument on the issue.”
• no cross-examination about a witness’s suicidal tendencies, especially considering the cross-examination about his drug use and criminal activity
• “We are not persuaded that a defendant need have any knowledge of a building’s effect on interstate commerce in order to be convicted under § 844(i).”
• “When a defendant fails to object to an instruction, or if he urges a different ground for the objection on appeal than before the district court, we review for plain error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).