United States v. Iodice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no clear error in crediting an officer’s testimony at suppression hearing, despite purported inconsistences between details in search warrant affidavit and hearing testimony, because “seemingly inconsistent testimony need not render a witness not credible”
• emphasizing “particularly strong deference” owed district court’s credibility determinations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).