United States v. Hertular

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “defendant who has invited a challenged charge has waived any right to appellate review” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• upholding enhancement based on district court’s finding that defendant constructively possessed hand grenades he offered to supply to another while under DEA surveillance
• “a defendant who has invited a challenged charge has waived any right to appellate review” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “[A] defendant who has invited a challenged charge has waived any right to appellate review.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “In general, we review a district court’s determination that a defendant deserves a[n] . . . enhancement . . . de novo . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).