United States v. Eliot S. Sash

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that even if the court were to “resort to the background commentary” of the means-of-identification enhancement, “nothing in the commentary requires that identity theft or ‘breeding’ be found in order to apply the [e]nhancement”
• “[N]othing in the commentary requires that identity theft or ‘breeding’ be found in order to apply the Enhancement, as the commentary merely states that the enhancement was ‘principally’-as opposed to ‘solely’-aimed at identity theft and ‘breeding.’”
• \A Guideline may apply in situations not contemplated by the background commentary to the Guideline.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).